Monday, October 3, 2011

Made in China

Nowadays, if you pick up anything cheap and plastic, from children's toys to home goods, you'll usually find the brand "made in China" on the underside. Most American consumers have generally accepted the fact that a large quantity of the items they buy are produced in China. Those who have problems with this (you know the Made-in-the-USA types) can pay the higher prices to buy things made in this country. Therefore, it seems surprising that such a tremendous surge of voices has come forward to condemn the new Martin Luther King Jr. sculpture, which, like your child's Barbie doll or flimsy flip-flops, was made in China.

The statue, part of the Washington D.C. Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial on the National Mall, has raised eyebrows because its Chinese artist, Lei Yixin, sculpted the work in China of Chinese granite. Of course if it had been a statue honoring I.M. Pei or any other Chinese-American, the public would have had no problem. But considering the function and purpose of the MLK Memorial, many Americans were outraged that a memorial for one of the greatest advocates of equality and peace was created by someone still living in a Communist state. Some more extreme critics went so far as to claim that the representation of Dr. King has Asian features and a Mao-like crossed-arm pose.

The children of Dr. King were reportedly pleased with the monument, praising Lei's depiction of their father. Many other visitors were equally impressed with the 30-foot sculpture, and millions more are projected to visit it this year. They don't seem to have a problem with the fact that it was made by a Chinese artist. Interestingly enough, none of the critics seemed to remember that America's most emblematic monument, the Statue of Liberty, was made in France by a Frenchman.

However, I am still trying to wrap my head around the whole argument: is there actually an ethical issue here? Or is it just another occasion where self-invested Americans are biting the hand that feeds?

1 comment:

  1. I cannot comment on the sculpture's appearance as I have not seen it first-hand. But I think there's something to be said about ignoring the wealth of Black American talent in the arts in favor of a Chinese sculptor, which perhaps was more a question of economic expediency than anything else. Do memorials have to be created by those who can relate most closely to the event or person the object memorializes? Offhand it seems Holocaust memorials are designed by Jews. One would have expected the greatest outcry to come from King's family and those on the committee, and yet they clearly were the ones who made the decision. In these terrible economic times, frankly, it would have been nice if they had thrown the commission to an American artist. Altogether I see this as another lost opportunity for a really great work of public art.

    ReplyDelete